The proof exists — in twelve places
The roster export, the clock data, the award clause, the email approval, the spreadsheet override. Assembling one answer means chasing all of them — per decision, per question.
Platform / Evidence Ledger
The Evidence Ledger records who made which decision, why, based on what data, under which policy, and with what outcome — assembled as work happens, so the answer already exists when anyone asks.
Every governed decision · replayable · regulator-ready
The problem
Today it doesn't. Workforce reviews begin with exports, screenshots, scattered timestamps, and approvals buried in inboxes — and the people who made the decisions may have moved on.
The roster export, the clock data, the award clause, the email approval, the spreadsheet override. Assembling one answer means chasing all of them — per decision, per question.
System logs say the job ran at 4:52pm. They don't say which rule applied, which version was in force, what data it evaluated, or whose authority approved the exception.
The history gets rebuilt under regulator deadline, at consulting prices — and a "good faith" defence depends on records nobody was asked to keep.
Provenance, not logs
Every workflow tool produces logs. The Ledger records something logs can't — the full decision, replayable later. Each entry contains:
The proof position
Without the Ledger, every question is a reconstruction. With it, the proof assembled itself while the work happened:
Evidence-led review
See how Smartta captures evidence as operations run so teams can investigate, explain, and defend workforce decisions more confidently.